Legal Opinion

Alaska Industrial Board v. Chugach Electric Ass'n

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 29, 1957No. 14616PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMLEY, Circuit Judge.

In this case, which arises under the Workmen’s Compensation Act of Alaska, two questions are presented on appeal. The first of these is whether, under the circumstances of this case, the Alaska Industrial Board had jurisdiction to reopen a previously-rejected claim for a temporary total disability award. The second is whether, if the board had such jurisdiction, it correctly granted such an award for injuries arising from the same accident in which a lump-sum award for permanent total disability had previously been granted.

The following facts, essential to a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Suryan v. Alaska Industrial BoardDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1950
  2. James L. Keehn v. Alaska Industrial Board, Bellingham Canning Co., and D.K. MacDonald & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
  3. Libby, McNeill & Libby v. Alaska Industrial BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
  4. Hilty v. Fairbanks Exploration Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Municipality of Anchorage v. LeighAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Sulkosky v. Morrison-KnudsenAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Alaska Industrial Board v. Chugach Electric AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API