Legal Opinion

Hilty v. Fairbanks Exploration Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 24, 1936No. 7760PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MATHEWS, Circuit Judge.

Appellant brought this action under the Alaska Workmen’s Compensation Act (Comp.Laws Alaska 1933, §§ 2161-2203) to recover of appellee compensation for a personal injury alleged to have been received by appellant in the course of her employment by appellee. Appellee demurred to appellant’s second amended- complaint, on the ground that it did not state facts sufficient, to constitute a cause of action and on the further ground that the action was not commenced within the time limited by law for the commencement of such actions. The District-. Court- sustained the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rogulj v. Alaska Gastineau Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1923

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Alaska Mines & Minerals, Inc. v. Alaska Industrial BoardAlaska Supreme Court · 1960
  2. James L. Keehn v. Alaska Industrial Board, Bellingham Canning Co., and D.K. MacDonald & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
  3. Mousel v. Bituminous Material & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1969
  4. Alaska Industrial Board v. Chugach Electric Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
  5. Alaska Industrial Board v. Chugach Electric AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API