Legal Opinion

Eitinger Bead Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided July 20, 1944No. C. D. 867PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Olivee, Presiding Judge:

This is an action brought to recover duties claimed to have been illegally exacted on a shipment of glass beads exported from Czechoslovakia and described on the invoice as “Glass beads: Maker: Joseph Ulbrich: 1089/5, col. 5 white.” A notation on the invoice indicates that these beads were assessed as “beads in imitation of precious stones and semiprecious stones, 45% Par. 1503” of the Tariff Act of 1930. They are claimed to be properly dutiable as beads, not specially provided for, under the same paragraph at only 35 per centum ad valorem. The paragraph involved,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. JudaeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  2. Walco Bead Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Eitinger Bead Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1946
  2. Gerstenzang Werner Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1948
  3. Klein v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
  4. Cohn & Rosenberger, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955
  5. Eitinger Bead Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API