Legal Opinion
Cohn & Rosenberger, Inc. v. United States
United States Customs Court
Decided May 25, 1955No. 59100; protests 48801-K, etc. (New York)Published
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Oliver, C. J.
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise marked “A” on the invoices consists of alabaster beads the same as those the subject of Eitinger Bead Co., Inc. v. United States (17 Cust. Ct. 56, C. D. 1020) and the items marked “B” consist of white beads similar to those involved in Eitinger Bead Co. v. United States (13 Cust. Ct. 50, C. D. 867), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Eitinger Bead Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1944
- Eitinger Bead Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1946