Legal Opinion

Cohn & Rosenberger, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided May 25, 1955No. 59100; protests 48801-K, etc. (New York)Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise marked “A” on the invoices consists of alabaster beads the same as those the subject of Eitinger Bead Co., Inc. v. United States (17 Cust. Ct. 56, C. D. 1020) and the items marked “B” consist of white beads similar to those involved in Eitinger Bead Co. v. United States (13 Cust. Ct. 50, C. D. 867), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Eitinger Bead Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1944
  2. Eitinger Bead Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1946