Legal Opinion

Klein v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided December 11, 1953No. 57678; protests 133755-K and 134663-K (New York)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This ease relates to certain beads represented by the following invoice items:

Protest Invoice description

133755-K 30 bchs, glass beads loose — 2638/2 col. 61 jet

134663-K 2645/2 matt jet 520 bchs. glass beads

2645/2 matt jet 420 bchs. glass beads

Samples of the articles in question are in evidence (plaintiff’s collective exhibits 1 and 2). For simplification in reference, the merchandise represented by the invoice item covered by protest 133755-K shall be referred to hereinafter as “the shiny bead” (plaintiff’s collective exhibit 1), and the articles represented by the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Eitinger Bead Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1944
  2. United States v. JudaeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kittay & Blitz, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955
  2. United States v. G. Klein & SonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API