Gerstenzang Werner Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Oliver, Chief Judge:
The protest in this case covers certain merchandise described on the invoice as “gallalith beads” assessed with duty at 45 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1503, Tariff Act of 1930, as beads in imitation of precious or semiprecious stones, and claimed by the plaintiff to be properly dutiable at 35 per centum ad valorem under the same paragraph as beads, not specially provided for.
The pertinent portions of paragraph 1503 read as follows:
Par. 1503. * * * beads * * * not specially provided for, 35 per centum ad valorem; * * * all other beads in imitation of precious or…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Eitinger Bead Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1944
- United States v. JudaeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
3Cited by3 opinions
- Eitinger Bead Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
- Gerstenzang Werner Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1949
- Gerstenzang Werner Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1949