Legal Opinion

Gerstenzang Werner Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided November 4, 1948No. C. D. 1136PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Oliver, Chief Judge:

The protest in this case covers certain merchandise described on the invoice as “gallalith beads” assessed with duty at 45 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1503, Tariff Act of 1930, as beads in imitation of precious or semiprecious stones, and claimed by the plaintiff to be properly dutiable at 35 per centum ad valorem under the same paragraph as beads, not specially provided for.

The pertinent portions of paragraph 1503 read as follows:

Par. 1503. * * * beads * * * not specially provided for, 35 per centum ad valorem; * * * all other beads in imitation of precious or…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Eitinger Bead Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1944
  2. United States v. JudaeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Eitinger Bead Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
  2. Gerstenzang Werner Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1949
  3. Gerstenzang Werner Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API