Legal Opinion
Dashiell v. Montgomery County
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided March 14, 1990No. Civ. A. R-89-1915PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
RAMSEY, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, six employees of Montgomery County who are not members of the defendant union recognized by the County as their exclusive bargaining representative, bring this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 to vindicate their rights under the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. In short, plaintiffs allege that the procedure implemented by the union to collect “reduced agency fees” from nonunion members is constitutionally deficient under standards enunciated by the Supreme Court in Chicago Teachers Union, Local No. 1,…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Patsy v. Board of Regents of Fla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Republic Steel Corp. v. MaddoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dashiell v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
- Dashiell v. Montgomery County, MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
- Mitchell v. Los Angeles Unified School DistrictDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1990