Legal Opinion
Dashiell v. Montgomery County
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided February 13, 1991No. 90-2350PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge:
In Chicago Teachers Union v. Hudson, 475 U.S. 292, 106 S.Ct. 1066, 89 L.Ed.2d 232 (1986), the Supreme Court held that the First Amendment requires that nonunion employees in an agency shop be afforded an adequate advance explanation of the basis for the collective bargaining fee charged to them by the union as their exclusive bargaining agent. The explanation is necessary to provide information sufficient to enable the nonunion employees to object to and protect against compulsory participation, through the payment of funds, in union activities unrelated to collective…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Abood v. Detroit Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- International Ass'n of MacHinists v. StreetSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Ellis v. Brotherhood of Railway, Airline & Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express & Station EmployesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Chicago Teachers Union, Local No. 1 v. HudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Railway Employes' Department v. HansonSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Cummings v. ConnellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Cummings v. ConnellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Dashiell v. Montgomery County, MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
- Belhumeur v. Labor Relations CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Scheffer v. Civil Service Employees Ass'n, Local 828Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.