Finster v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MAZZANT, Justice.
Daniel Eric Finster appeals his convictions for criminal mischief (appeal number 05-03-01030-CR) and resisting arrest, search, or transportation (appeal number 05-03-01029-CR). A jury found appellant guilty of both offenses, and the court assessed punishment at ninety days’ confinement and a $1000 .fine for each offense. In two issues, appellant argues (1) there was no evidence to support a conviction for resisting arrest or resisting transportation, and (2) he was denied his right to a unanimous verdict because the charge allowed conviction on resisting arrest,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Turner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Kitchens v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Vick v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
- Alvarado v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Francis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Rangel v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2006
- Tyson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2005
- Clement v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2008
- Mathonican v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2006
- Hartis v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.