Legal Opinion

Mathonican v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)

Decided May 12, 2006No. 06-05-00056-CRPublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Chief Justice MORRISS.

The State charged Earl Edward Ma-thonican with the crime of sexually assaulting J.M. by causing three distinct penile penetrations without J.M.’s consent — J.M. penetrating Mathonican’s anus and mouth, and Mathonican penetrating J.M.’s mouth. See Tex. Pen.Code Ann. § 22.011 (Vernon Supp.2005). The State also sought and obtained a jury finding that, during the commission of the offenses, Mathonican used or exhibited a deadly weapon, that is, his HIV-positive seminal fluid.1 After convicting Mathonican, the jury assessed his punishment at ninety-seven…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  3. Ngo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
  4. Curry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  5. Abdnor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Gonzalez Soto v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2008
  2. Miles v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2008
  3. Ruiz v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2008
  4. Lopez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2009
  5. Padilla v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2009

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API