Mathonican v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by
Chief Justice MORRISS.
The State charged Earl Edward Ma-thonican with the crime of sexually assaulting J.M. by causing three distinct penile penetrations without J.M.’s consent — J.M. penetrating Mathonican’s anus and mouth, and Mathonican penetrating J.M.’s mouth. See Tex. Pen.Code Ann. § 22.011 (Vernon Supp.2005). The State also sought and obtained a jury finding that, during the commission of the offenses, Mathonican used or exhibited a deadly weapon, that is, his HIV-positive seminal fluid.1 After convicting Mathonican, the jury assessed his punishment at ninety-seven…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Ngo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
- Curry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Abdnor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Gonzalez Soto v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2008
- Miles v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2008
- Ruiz v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2008
- Lopez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2009
- Padilla v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2009
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.