Francis v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court 1
OPINION ON STATE’S MOTION FOR REHEARING
2Opinion of the Court · HollandHolland, J.
MEYERS, MANSFIELD, PRICE, WOMACK and JOHNSON, JJ„ join.
Following our opinion on original submission, we granted the State’s Motion for Rehearing. We withdraw our prior opinions in this case and enter the following opinion of the Court.
Appellant was charged- with a single count of indecency with a child. The State introduced evidence of four acts of indecency during its case-in-chief, but elected to proceed on only two of those acts. Throughout the trial, appellant asked the trial court to require the State to elect between the two different acts of…
3Cases cited9 opinions
- Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Schad v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- McKoy v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Kitchens v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Vernon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by253 opinions
- Ngo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
- Cosio v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
- Jefferson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
- Pizzo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
- Huffman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2008
248 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.