Legal Opinion

Rangel v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 25, 2006No. 2-04-514-CRPublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON THE STATE’S SECOND PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

TERRIE LIVINGSTON, Justice.

Pursuant to rule of appellate procedure 50, we have reconsidered our previous opinion on the State’s petition for discretionary review. See Tex.R.App. P. 50. We withdraw our judgment and opinion dated June 5, 2006, and substitute the following in order to address and apply the recent Supreme Court case of Davis v. Washington, — U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 2266, 165 L.Ed.2d 224 (2006).

I. Introduction

Appellant Rodolfo Rangel appeals from his convictions of aggravated sexual assault of a child, indecency with a…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  4. Cain v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  5. Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Bargas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2008
  2. Martinez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2007
  3. State v. BlueNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Thierry v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2009
  5. State v. HendersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API