Legal Opinion

Fensterer v. Pressure Lighting Co.

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided May 15, 1914PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Interpleader to determine rights to fund in the hands of the chamberlain of the city of New York.

1Opinion of the CourtRansom, J.

By supplemental pleadings, served subsequently to the entry of an order of interpleader obtained by the National City Bank of New York, the parties ask the court equitably to determine their respective rights in and to a fund of $805.23, now in the banffs of the chamberlain of the city of New York. The circumstances of the controversy are, in outline, as follows: On January 10, 1914, the regular course of mail brought to the office of the Pressure Lighting Company a check for $805.23, drawn by the city of New York to the order of that corporation, as payment under a contract which the company…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ward v. City Trust Co. of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  2. Rochester & Charlotte Turnpike Road Co. v. PaviourNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  3. Niagara Woolen Co. v. Pacific BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
  4. Commercial Wood & Cement Co. v. Northampton Portland Cement Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  5. First National Bank v. Commercial Travelers' Home Ass'n of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kaufman v. ShoenbergCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1952
  2. Kaufman v. ShoenbergCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1952
  3. Bruch v. National Guarantee Credit Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1922
  4. Fensterer v. Pressure Lighting Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API