Legal Opinion

Niagara Woolen Co. v. Pacific Bank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 2, 1910PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, the Pacific Bank, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk-of the county of New York on the 19th day of July, 1909, upon the report of a referee.

1Opinion of the Court

Ingraham, P. J.:

This action was tried before a referee, and the facts as found by him are not, as I understand, disputed. The plaintiff was a domestic corporation, of which one Joseph Horowitz was the president down to May 1, 1904, when he was succeeded by Philip Horowitz, who continued as president until October 28, 1904. The plaintiff was organized to act as selling agent fór a corporation known as the American Woolen Company. The capital stock was substantially all issued to Philip Horowitz, and was subsequently deposited with the American Woolen Company under an arrangement between…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ward v. City Trust Co. of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  2. Havana Central Railroad v. Knickerbocker Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1910
  3. Havana Central Railroad v. Knickerbocker Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Havana Cent. R. v. Central Trust Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1913
  2. Brede Decorating, Inc. v. Jefferson Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1961
  3. McIntosh v. Detroit Savings BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  4. E. Moch Co. v. Security BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
  5. Rensselaer Valve Co. v. National Bank of Commerce of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1924

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API