Kaufman v. Shoenberg
Court of Chancery of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Seitz, Chancellor:
I am required to determine the validity of defendant corporation’s stock option plan.
*215Plaintiff, common stockholder, brought this action to enjoin the effectuation of defendant’s so-called Restricted Stock Option Plan for Key Employees. Defendant joined issue and this is the decision on final hearing.
A chronological narration of the facts will illume the issues to be resolved.
Defendant1 was incorporated on January 28, 1924 although its business history goes back to 1908. It is a corporation of institutional size, having about 19,000 stockholders, resources in excess of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kerbs v. California Eastern Airways, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1952
- Gottlieb v. Heyden Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1952
- Kerbs v. California Eastern Airways, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1952
- Harker v. McKissockSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
- Wyles v. CampbellDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1948
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Michelson v. DuncanSupreme Court of Delaware · 1979
- International Insurance Co., a Corporation v. Alfred M. Johns, James W. McFadden Thomas v. Ogletree, Richard W. Sherman, and G. Paul WhortonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- Saxe v. BradyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1962
- Kaufman v. ShoenbergCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1952
- Greene v. DietzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.