Legal Opinion

Piedmont Fire Ins. Co. v. Tierce

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 13, 1944No. 6 Div. 138PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The action was based on a fire insurance policy. The assignments of error are conveniently grouped by counsel. The action was on a policy of fire insurance for the recovery of the loss or damage to a building and certain personal property located therein, the policy insuring such building “while occupied by owner as store and dwelling.” The complaint contained one count in code form. Demurrer to the complaint was overruled and thereupon appellant filed pleas 1 through 21. Such pleas were in substance the general issue and special pleas to the effect that the building at the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Girard Fire Marine Ins. Co. v. GunnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  2. Talley v. WhitlockSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  3. Penticost v. MasseySupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
  4. Fleming v. L. & N. R. R.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1906
  5. Fidelity Phenix Fire Ins. Co. of New York v. RaperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Alabama Power Company v. TaylorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  2. McLaney v. TurnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  3. Continental Casualty Company v. Mrs. Gladys Leith HolmesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
  4. New Hampshire Fire Insurance Co. v. CurtisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  5. Citizens Bank v. RouthCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API