Citizens Bank v. Routh
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
This appeal is the result of a judgment for fraud and misrepresentation which was rendered against the appellant in the Circuit Court of Limestone County.
Appellant (The Citizens Bank of Moulton, Alabama) contends that the jury verdict awarding damages to appellees (Donald and Mary Routh) was improper in both its form and substance. Specifically, appellant claims that the jury verdict rendered against it was improper for two reasons: (1) the form in which the jury rendered its verdict demonstrates that the jury failed to follow the instructions of the trial court; and (2) the jury's verdict…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Butler v. OlshanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
- Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. WilkesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
- Tombrello v. McGheeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
- Piedmont Fire Ins. Co. v. TierceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
- Hubbard v. ThrasherAlabama Court of Appeals · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- B & M HOMES, INC. v. HoganSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
- Empiregas, Inc. of Ardmore v. HardySupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
- Hill v. SereneckCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1978
- Sewell v. INTERNAL MEDICINESupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
- Holland v. City of AlabasterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.