Legal Opinion
Irilarry v. Byers
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 17, 1927No. Docket No. 4416PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCraig, J.
From the admitted facts in this ease it appears that on and prior to May 3, 1918, the respondent James C. Byers was sheriff of San Diego County, and that one James Kennedy was a contractor engaged in the construction of the then uncompleted Otay dam across a certain gorge, in said county; that Kennedy was in possession of, and owned an interest in, a large quantity of machinery, tools, implements, and paraphernalia, including one Marion steam shovel, Model 36, which were used in such construction work. On May 3, 1918, a writ of attachment issued out of the superior court of Los Angeles County…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rudolph v. SaundersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Braden v. ClineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Cudahy v. . RhinehartNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Smart v. SoseyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Dreisbach v. BradenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hart v. Oliver Farm Equipment Sales Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1933
- Gilbank v. BentonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Ruskin v. CheneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Quarles v. Citizens' Nat. Bank of SalmonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929