Legal Opinion
Dreisbach v. Braden
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 22, 1919No. Civ. No. 1909PublishedCited by 3 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
The defendant, Braden, as sheriff of Plumas County, and the National Surety Company, as the surety on his official bond, were sued by plaintiffs for the sum of $1,050, the alleged value of about 50 tons of chrome ore which they had purchased at an execution sale and which they alleged the sheriff had not delivered to them, and for damages caused to them by his failure so to deliver said ore. Defendants had judgment, from which plaintiffs prosecute this appeal.
The first finding of the court was: That all the allegations in plaintiffs’ complaint-in paragraphs 1 to 11, inclusive, are true.
Said…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mills v. CampSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1841
- Aigeltinger v. WhelanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Bicknell v. TrickeySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1852
3Cited by3 opinions
- Harvey v. WhyteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Irilarry v. ByersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Quarles v. Citizens' Nat. Bank of SalmonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929