Legal Opinion

Imus v. Ann Arbor Railroad

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1912No. Docket No. 14PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Washtenaw; Kinne, J. Case by Nelson Imus, Jr., by next friend, against the Ann Arbor Railroad Company for personal injuries. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtBird, J.

Plaintiff, a boy of 17 years of age, with several other boys, was coasting one winter evening on Pelch street, in the city of Ann Arbor, and while so engaged ran into defendant’s switch engine and was injured. Pelch street extends east and west, and crosses the defendant’s railway at nearly right angles. The railway is constructed in a valley, and from the point where they intersect the ground on both sides rises, within a short distance, to a considerable height. In 1903 the defendant was permitted to elevate its tracks in the city, since which time the traffic on Pelch street has passed…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Moran v. Detroit, Ypsilanti & Ann Arbor RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Theisen v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sturm v. Tri-City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1920
  2. Garland v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API