Legal Opinion

Sturm v. Tri-City Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided July 6, 1920PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Scott District Court. — A. P. Barker, Judge. Verdict and judgment for personal injuries sustained by the appellee, plaintiff. Defendant appeals. —

1Opinion of the CourtSalinger, J.

— I. In an amendment to abstract, appellee makes the following statement:

1- m»oítf presumpSctY1 insuffi-" cient rebuttal. “Denies that appellant’s abstract is a complete and correct abstract of the pleadings, evidence, and reporter’s transcript of evidence, etc., and makes the following corrections and additions thereto, but ¿enjes that said abstract as so amended contains the evidence as to the nature and extent of the injuries received by plaintiff at the time of the injuries in question and subsequent thereto, and denies that it contains the evidence relating to the extent or amount of…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Snyder v. Han. & St. Jos. R. R.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1875
  2. Morrissey v. Eastern RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879
  3. Burford v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  4. State v. O'DonnellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  5. State v. BrooksSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. O'Hara v. ChaplinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  2. McElhinney v. KnittleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  3. Louisville Railway Co. v. BreedenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  4. Berhow v. KroackSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
  5. Berhow v. KroackSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API