Legal Opinion

Theisen v. Detroit United Railway

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 28, 1910No. Docket No. 137PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Wayne; Hosmer, J. Case by Anthony Theisen against the Detroit United Railway for personal injuries. A judgment for plaintiff is reviewed by defendant on writ of error.

1Opinion of the CourtBlair, J.

Plaintiff, while driving a hose cart to a fire in the line of his duty as an employe of the fire depart' ment, was injured in a collision with one of defendant’s cars at the intersection of Brush and Adams streets in the city of Detroit. Defendant was operating a double-track line on Adams avenue and a single-track line on Brush street. Plaintiff was proceeding east on Adams avenue at a speed of about 10 miles an hour, requiring a space of 150 feet within which to stop his horses. There is a building at the northwest corner of Brush and Adams extending out to the sidewalk lines of both…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McKernan v. Detroit Citizens' Street-Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Garrity v. Detroit Citizens' Street Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. McKay v. HargisMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  2. City of Kalamazoo v. PriestMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Indianapolis Traction & Terminal Co. v. HensleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Green v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Imus v. Ann Arbor RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API