Legal Opinion

Baldwin v. Standard Accident Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 30, 1932PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Kirk, P. J.

The questions presented in these two actions are in all essentials identical. The actions are brought to recover upon bonds executed and delivered under article 20 of the Agriculture and Markets Law, as it stood in 1928, 1929 and 1930. In this article, as amended to and including the year 1928, and prior to its revision by chapter 204 of the Laws of 1932, are provisions as follows:

*335“ § 244. * * * 1. The term commission merchant shall include every person, firm, exchange, association and corporation licensed under this article to receive, sell or offer for sale on commission within this State…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Potts v. . PardeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. Howard v. . MootNew York Court of Appeals · 1876

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Claim of Harzinski v. Village of EndicottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  2. Bozied v. EdgertonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  3. Wickham v. Champlain Creameries, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Chemical Bank v. PadillaCivil Court of the City of New York · 1971
  5. Baldwin v. Standard Accident InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API