Legal Opinion
Bozied v. Edgerton
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 1, 1953No. 35,924PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Matson, Justice.
Appeal from an order vacating certain findings of the Commissioner of Agriculture, Dairy, and Food for the state of Minnesota (herein referred to as the commissioner).
The respondent is Harold A. Bozied, a produce dealer located at Brookings, South Dakota, who sold a carload of eggs to Pete Edger-ton, a wholesale produce dealer located at Walnut Grove, Minnesota. Edgerton was licensed and bonded under the Minnesota wholesale produce dealers act (M. S. A. 27.01 to 27.20).
Edgerton’s check for $7,437.20, given to Bozied in payment of a carload of eggs, was returned for…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Boeing v. OwsleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Renlund v. Commodore Mining Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
- Stronge & Lightner Co. v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Farmers Co-Operative Elevator Co. v. EngeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Baldwin v. Standard Accident InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sharfarz v. Goguen (In Re Goguen)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
- Anchor Casualty Co. v. BONGARDS CO-OPERATIVE CREAMERY ASSN.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Western Meat, Inc. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965