Legal Opinion

Wickham v. Champlain Creameries, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1963PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtIsadore Bookstein, J.

This is an action for an injunction by plaintiff, Commissioner of Agriculture and Markets (hereinafter called “ Commissioner ”), pursuant to section 258-e of the Agriculture and Markets Law, to compel defendant to deposit funds in an escrow account to be maintained to secure payment for milk purchased by defendant, as provided for in subdivision 7 of section 258-b of the Agriculture and Markets Law which went into effect April 1, 1963.

There is substantially no factual dispute. The determination of the issue between the parties is virtually a question of law.

Basically, defendant relies on four…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc. v. Du MondSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. People v. . Beakes Dairy Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
  3. People v. PerrettaNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  4. State v. LathamSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1916
  5. Wilson v. . IsraelNew York Court of Appeals · 1920

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wickham v. Champlain Creameries, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
  2. Ore-Ida Potato Products, Inc. v. United Pacific InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Ore-Ida Potato Products, Inc. v. United Pacific InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API