Legal Opinion
Claim of Harzinski v. Village of Endicott
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 26, 1987PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Levine, J.
Claimants, firemen employed by the Village of Endicott in Broome County, were injured and disabled in the course of performing their firefighting duties. Pursuant to General Municipal Law § 207-a (1), the village paid each claimant his full wages while disabled. Subsequently, in 1979 claimants retired and commenced receiving accidental disability retirement benefits pursuant to Retirement and Social Security Law § 363. In accordance with General Municipal Law § 207-a (2), the village then paid to each claimant "the difference between the amounts received under…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Westchester Fire Insurance v. DavenportNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Mashnouk v. MilesNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Baldwin v. Standard Accident InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
- Baldwin v. Standard Accident Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
3Cited by4 opinions
- Matter of Schulze v. City of Newburgh Fire Dept.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
- Matter of Schulze v. City of Newburgh Fire Dept.New York Court of Appeals · 2025
- Matter of Schulze v. City of Newburgh Fire Dept.New York Court of Appeals · 2025
- Matter of Pomerantz v. City of Newburgh Fire Dept.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023