Northern Texas Traction Co. v. Thetford
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion
On Motion For Rehearing.
In the motion for rehearing special emphasis is directed to the contention that is-sues 5, 6, and 7, relating to the issue of discovered peril, are too broad and general, and are framed so as to leave the jury to speculate and surmise as to the particular time the motorman saw plaintiff’s automobile, the contention being that these issues wholly ignore the vital “time element,” as discussed in the opinion of Judge Critz, of Section A of the Commission of Appeals in the case of Northern Texas Traction Co. v. Weed, 300 S. W. 41.
This objection is one of numerous others to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Northern Texas Traction Co. v. WeedTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
- Sears v. SearsTexas Supreme Court · 1876
- Furst-Edwards v. St. Louis S. W. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1912
- Gulf Refining Co. v. YoungbloodCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
- St. Louis S.W. Ry. Co. of Texas v. InmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.