St. Louis S.W. Ry. Co. of Texas v. Inman

The judgment appealed from was reversed by this court because we thought certain findings of the jury on which it was based were so contradictory as to destroy each other. See 283 S. W. 689. A writ of error having been granted by the Supreme Court, it held (erroneously, we think), on the recommendation of section B of the Commission of Appeals (based on Hines v. Foreman, 243 S. W. 479, and Smith v. Railway Co., 277 S. W. 103, which we regard as inapplicable to the question decided), that the conclusion reached by us was wrong, and, reversing the judgment rendered here, remanded the cause to…