Legal Opinion

Furst-Edwards v. St. Louis S. W. Ry. Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 10, 1912PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Hill County; W. C. Wear, Judge. Action by Furst-Edwards & Co. against the St. Louis Southwestern Railway Company, From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

This suit was brought by appellants against appellee to collect about $10,000 alleged to be due on account of the burning of cotton belonging to appellants, situated on the compress platform at Hillsboro, Tex., on January 16, 1908. The facts will appear from the findings of the jury on special issues, and from the evidence hereinafter referred to in this opinion. The court submitted the case upon the following special issues, which were answered by the jury at herein indicated:

"(1) Was any cotton belonging to the plaintiff damaged or destroyed by fire on the compress platform at Hillsboro on…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. BreadowTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  2. I. & G. N. R. R. Co. v. CockeTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Isbell v. New York & New Haven RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1858
  4. McDonald v. International & Great Northern Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Houston & Texas Central Railroad v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1879

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. A. C. Burton Co. v. StasnyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
  2. Allen v. Texas N. O. R. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  3. Hodges v. NixCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
  4. Missouri Pacific Railroad Co. v. SkipperSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  5. Cannon v. FreyermuthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API