Legal Opinion

Haden v. City of Atlanta

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 15, 1933No. 9467PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

1. As a general rule, no property can be sold under a tax execution in personam as the property of the defendant therein, when the defendant has neither title nor possession nor any right to represent the person who has it; and a sale under these circumstances would be void as to the true owner. Nelson v. Brown, 174 Ga. 150 (2) (162 S. B. 276); McLeod v. Brooks Lumber Co., 98 Ga. 253 (2) (26 S. E. 745) ; Burns v. Lewis, 86 Ga. 591 (5) (13 S. E. 123) ; Civil Code (1910), § 1018.

2. Where a municipal corporation, after causing an illegal and void sale as indicated in the preceding note,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  2. Burns v. LewisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
  3. Hancock v. KingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  4. Verdery v. DottererSupreme Court of Georgia · 1882
  5. Peoples Credit Clothing Co. v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. James v. RileySupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
  2. Patterson v. Florida Realty & Finance Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1956
  3. Martin v. ClarkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  4. Anderson v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  5. Deraney v. MaysSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API