Legal Opinion

James v. Riley

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 15, 1935No. 10970PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Justice.

1. As a general rule, no property' can be sold under a tax execution in personam as the property of the defendant therein, when the defendant has neither title nor possession nor any right to represent the person who has it; and a sale under these circumstances would be void as to the true owner. Haden v. Atlanta, 177 Ga. 869 (171 S. E. 703). The evidence did not demand a finding in favor of the defendant by reason of the tax sale under which he claimed.

2. To maintain an action for trespass or injury to realty, it is essential that the plaintiff show either that he was the true…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Downing v. AndersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  2. Fender v. GardnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  3. Whiddon v. Williams Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1896
  4. Hefner v. Fulton Bag & Cotton MillsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
  5. Morris v. GibsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Bennett v. RewisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
  2. Bruce v. StricklandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
  3. Hobbs v. HoustonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  4. Shirling v. HesterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
  5. Bennett v. RewisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1955

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API