Legal Opinion

Martin v. Clark

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 17, 1940No. 13199PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Reid, Chief Justice.

While the plaintiffs offered no written evidence of their title to the disputed premises, proof that their ancestor died in possession was sufficient. Bagley v. Kennedy, 85 Ga. 703 (11 S. E. 1091). This is especially true where the facts relied upon by plaintiffs as establishing their title were not challenged, but instead the defendant sought to establish in himself title emanating from the same source.

“As a general rule, no property can be sold under a tax execution in personam as the property of the defendant therein, when the defendant has neither title nor possession…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. McDonald v. DabneySupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  2. Burns v. LewisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
  3. Knox v. YowSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
  4. Acme Brewing Co. v. Central Railroad & Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  5. Bagley v. KennedySupreme Court of Georgia · 1890

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. McDonald v. TaylorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
  2. Patterson v. Florida Realty & Finance Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1956
  3. Gurley v. East Atlanta Land Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2003
  4. Leathers v. McClainSupreme Court of Georgia · 1986
  5. Coleman v. DurdenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API