Legal Opinion
Gay v. Hartford Underwriters Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 3, 1995No. 82930PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KAUGER, Vice Chief Justice.
The dispositive issue is whether this appeal is governed by Gay I which held that the evidence introduced at trial demonstrated a mutual mistake warranting contract reformation. We find that it is. 1
FACTS
On January 19,1988, the appellant, Robert E. Gay (Gay/insured) telephoned Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company (Har-ford/insurer), and requested information regarding insurance coverage for three ears. 2 Hartford sent Gay an application form which listed several types and amounts of coverage available for the cars, and the premium charged for each type and amount.
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Messler v. Simmons Gun Specialties, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Handy v. City of LawtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Smith v. OwensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
- Snow v. WinnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- Parker v. ElamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Max True Plastering Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Titchenal v. DexterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
- Beshara v. Southern National BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- State v. PriceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012
- Hoover v. Kiowa Tribe of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.