Racine-Sattley Co. v. Meinen

Good, 0.

This case is now before us on rehearing. For the former opinion see ante, p. 32. This is an action in replevin, and. was apparently instituted in 'the district court by the plaintiff to recover a quantity of agricultural implements. *34All of the defendants answered by a general denial. A jury was waived, and trial had' to the court. The defendants had judgment, and the plaintiff appeals.

The former opinion affirmed the judgment of the district court upon the theory that the petition did not state a cause of action, and was based upon the holding of this court in Case Threshing Machine…