National Cordage Co. v. Sims
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error from the district court of Cuming county. Tried below before Norris, J. T. M. Franse and P. M. Moodie, contra, cited, contending that the property was subject to attachment as Yoder’s: Forrest v. Nelson, 108 Pa. St., 481; Peck v. Heim, 17 Atl. Rep., [Pa.]. 984; Carleton v. Sumner, 4 Pick. [Mass.], 516; Dresser Mfg. Co. v. Waterston, 3 Met. [Mass.], 18; Mixer v. Cook, 31 Me., 340; Bowen v. Burk, 13 Pa.
Read the full summary
Error from the district court of Cuming county. Tried below before Norris, J. T. M. Franse and P. M. Moodie, contra, cited, contending that the property was subject to attachment as Yoder’s: Forrest v. Nelson, 108 Pa. St., 481; Peck v. Heim, 17 Atl. Rep., [Pa.]. 984; Carleton v. Sumner, 4 Pick. [Mass.], 516; Dresser Mfg. Co. v. Waterston, 3 Met. [Mass.], 18; Mixer v. Cook, 31 Me., 340; Bowen v. Burk, 13 Pa. St., 146; Scudder v. Bradbury, 106 Mass., 427; Barry v. Palmer, 19 Me., 303; Fuller v. Bean, 34 N; H., 290, 303.
1Opinion of the CourtPost, J.
This was an action of replevin in the district court for Cuming county, by which the plaintiff below, plaintiff in error, the National Cordage Company, sought to recover possession of 9,100 pounds of binder twine. The facts essential to an understanding of the questions presented for determination are as follows: On the 7th day of June, 1891, the plaintiff appointed one B. Y. Yoder agent for the sale on commission of its binder twine at West Point, in said county. During the season of 1891 about 20,000’ pounds of twine were consigned by the plaintiff to Yoder for sale under the terms and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Dyer v. ThorstadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- McClelland v. ScrogginNebraska Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by15 opinions
- In re Columbus Buggy Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
- Mack v. Drummond Tobacco Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1896
- Charles M. Stieff, Inc. v. City of San AntonioTexas Supreme Court · 1938
- Eilers Music House v. FairbanksWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Wilson-Moline Buggy Co. v. PriebeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1907
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.