Legal Opinion

McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. Callen

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1896No. 6725PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from the district court of Sherman county. Tried below before Holcomb, J.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

On September 8, 1888, the plaintiff: made a conditional sale of a mowing machine to J. W. Rose and E. P. Bridges. By the terms of the written contract of sale the title and ownership of the machine were expressly reserved, and remained vested in the seller until such time as a note given as a part of the purchase consideration should be paid in full by the buyers. The plaintiff did not file a copy of the written contract of sale in the office of the clerk of the county wherein the purchasers of the mower resided. October 24, 1889, a chattel mortgage was executed by J. W. Rose in favor of J.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Aultman, Miller & Co. v. MalloryNebraska Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Campbell Printing Press & Manufacturing Co. v. DyerNebraska Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re Great Western Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
  2. Mattley v. WolfeDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1909
  3. Racine-Sattley Co. v. MeinenNebraska Supreme Court · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API