Legal Opinion

In Re Copper Antitrust Litigation

District Court, W.D. Wisconsin

Decided May 9, 2000No. M.D.L. No. 1303, No. 99-C-801-CPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

98 F.Supp.2d 1039 (2000)

In re COPPER ANTITRUST LITIGATION.

Ocean View Capital, Inc., f/k/a Triangle Wire & Cable, Inc., Plaintiff,

v.

Sumitomo Corporation of America, Sumitomo Corporation, Sumitomo Futures Corporation, Yasuo Hamanaka, Global Minerals and Metals Corporation, David Campbell, and Credit Lyonnais Rouse, Defendants.

M.D.L. No. 1303, No. 99-C-801-C.

United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin.

May 9, 2000.

William R. Steinmetz, Reinhart, Boerner, Van Deuren, Norris & Rieselbach, S.C., Milwaukee, WI, for Loeb Industries, Inc.

David H. Weinstein, Weinstein, Kitchenoff, etc, Philadelphia,…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination UnitSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Knevelbaard Dairies v. Kraft Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  2. Howe v. Bank for International SettlementsDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2002
  3. Loeb Industries, Inc. v. Sumitomo Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  4. Merced Irrigation District v. Barclays Bank PLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
  5. In Re Vitamins Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API