Legal Opinion
In Re Vitamins Antitrust Litigation
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 8, 2004No. MISC. 99-197(TFH), MDL 1285PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
THOMAS F. HOGAN, Chief Judge.
Pending before the Court is E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Company’s Motion to Amend the Court’s March 9, 2004 Memorandum Opinion Re: Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment on the Issue of an All-Vitamins Conspiracy and Vacate the Order as to DuPont [# 4611], The Court has carefully considered the motion as well as the opposition submitted by Publix and Meijer. For the reasons stated in the Amended Memorandum Opinion Re: Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment on the Issue of an “All-Vitamins Conspiracy” issued April 8, 2004 [#4619],' it is hereby
ORDERED that the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Romero v. Philip Morris Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2010
- Meredith Corp. v. Sesac LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- In re Polyurethane Foam Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2015
- Federal Trade Commission v. Match Group, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2023
- In Re: Domestic Airline Travel Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.