Legal Opinion

Seneca-Cayuga Tribe v. Oklahoma ex rel. Thompson

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 3, 1989No. 86-1885PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.

The Seneca-Cayuga Tribe of Oklahoma and the Quapaw Tribe of Oklahoma are federally recognized Indian tribes that operate high-stakes bingo games on trust land. They brought this action to enjoin a pending state court suit in which the State of Oklahoma sought to enjoin operation of the bingo games. The federal court held that it was not required to abstain, and issued a preliminary injunction. We affirm.

I

BACKGROUND

In 1983, the State of Oklahoma sued the Seneca-Cayuga and Quapaw Tribes in separate actions in state court seeking to enjoin the operation of Tribal bingo…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Pennzoil Co. v. Texaco Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Huffman v. Pursue, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Phelps v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
  2. Fred W. Phelps, Sr. And Edward F. Engel v. Joan Hamilton, in Her Official Capacity as District AttorneyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  3. Winn v. CookCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
  4. Sycuan Band of Mission Indians v. RoacheCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  5. Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah & Ouray Reservation v. UtahCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API