Legal Opinion

Dyrssen v. Union Electric Light & Power Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided May 24, 1927PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAtwood, J.

This is an action to recover- damages for a wrist injury sustained'by plaintiff while cranking a Ford automobile..furnished him by defendant in connection with bis .duties.as meter inspector. Tbe trial judge sustained a demurrer tq plaintiff’s evidence, whereupon the jury returned a verdict for defendant, and from, the judgment rendered thereon, plaintiff has .appealed. . ¡.

Plaintiff, alleged that defendant wasmegligent m failing to furnish plaintiff with reasonably, safe tools, and appliances with which-to work in that “the spark, control and the commutator-On said Ford automobile was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Crim v. CrimSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901
  2. Mateer v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  3. Hopkins v. RailroadTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Johnston v. Covenant Mutual Life InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1902
  5. Magee v. VerityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1903

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Poe v. Illinois Cent. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1936
  2. Brennecke v. Ganahl Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  3. State Ex Rel. Union Pac. Railroad Co. v. BlandSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930
  4. Higgins v. American Car Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1929
  5. John Doe No. 1 v. Knights of ColumbusDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2013

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API