Legal Opinion

James v. McConnell and Margot Murphy McConnell v. Pickering Lumber Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 21, 1954No. 13602_1PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEALY, Circuit Judge.

This is a diversity case involving in major part the local interpretation of section 3399 of the California Civil Code, relating to the reformation of contracts. 1

Appellants, citizens of New York, brought suit against appellee, a Delaware corporation with its principal offices in Kansas City, to recover upon a written contract, copy of which was attached and made a part of the complaint. As an alternative to recovery on the contract as written, reformation was asked on grounds of mutual mistake or “mistake of plaintiffs known or suspected by defendants.” The court on…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United Iron Works v. Outer Harbor Dock & Wharf Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Auerbach v. HealyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Barnhart Aircraft, Inc. v. PrestonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Bailard v. MardenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Eagle Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lemoge Electric v. County of San MateoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Getty v. GettyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  3. Paterson v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF MONTECITO UNION SCH. DIST.California Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. Westlands Water District v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2001
  5. Samuel Lipshitz v. Richard FogelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API