Porr v. NYNEX Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Friedmann, J.
The plaintiff is a NYNEX customer and ratepayer in Westchester County who purports to represent both himself and *567others similarly situated. The plaintiff charges that the defendants "secretly” and "fraudulently” followed "a policy of charging for phone calls in whole-minute increments only”. For example, if a phone call lasts for two minutes and one second, the defendants charge for a full three minutes. It is the plaintiffs position that the defendants failed to state this policy plainly in their rate schedules filed with the Public Service Commission as…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Oswego Laborers' Local 214 Pension Fund v. Marine Midland Bank, N. A.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Keogh v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Montana-Dakota Utilities Co. v. Northwestern Public Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Maislin Industries, U. S., Inc. v. Primary Steel, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Nader v. Allegheny Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Francis S. v. StoneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Tenore v. AT&T Wireless ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Day v. AT & T CORP.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- Coll v. First American Title InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Weinberg v. Sprint Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.