Legal Opinion
Weinberg v. Sprint Corp.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided July 22, 2002PublishedCited by 85 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
LaVECCHIA, J.
In Meshinsky v. Nichols Yacht Sales, Inc., 110 N.J. 464, 541 A.2d 1063 (1988), the Court addressed the requirement that a private plaintiff sustain an ascertainable loss in order to bring a *237cause of action under the Consumer Fraud Act, N.J.S.A. 56:8-1 to 20(Act). Meshinsky noted that the positions of a private plaintiff and the Attorney General are sharply different in that respect. “While the Attorney General does not have to prove that the victim was damaged by the unlawful conduct, N.J.S.A. 56:8-2, a private plaintiff must show that he…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Keogh v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Maislin Industries, U. S., Inc. v. Primary Steel, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. CarlSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Central Office Telephone, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by85 opinions
- Bosland v. Warnock Dodge, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2009
- Thiedemann v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLCSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
- Anthony D'agostino v. Ricardo Maldonado (068940)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
- Charles McNair v. Synapse Grp IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- DepoLink Court Reporting & Litigation Support Services v. RochmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2013
80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.