Legal Opinion
Mack v. Astrue
District Court, N.D. California
Decided January 15, 2013No. Case No. 12-cv-01221 NCPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE: CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
NATHANAEL M. COUSINS, United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff Steven Mack seeks judicial review of the Commissioner of Social Security’s final decision denying Mack’s claim for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) as a person disabled and unable to engage in substantial gainful activity. Both parties move for summary judgment. The issues are (1) whether the ALJ properly weighed the medical opinions, and (2) whether substantial evidence supports the ALJ’s decision. The Court finds that the ALJ did not err in weighing the medical opinions and that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Molina v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Deborah L. Burch v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Jana M. Bayliss v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Mary M. MAGALLANES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Silva Tonapetyan v. William A. Halter, Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- (SS) Martinez v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
- (SS) Vasquez v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022