Legal Opinion
Halpin v. North American Refractories Co.
City of New York Municipal Court
Decided January 24, 1934PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Max J. Wolff,
Referee. The defendant, a foreign corporation, engaged in the manufacture and sale of fire brick and clay, appears specially herein and objects to the jurisdiction of the court, contending that it is not doing business within the State and is not subject to the process of this court in an action brought against it by a resident of New York.
Defendant’s home office is in Cleveland, Ohio, and it maintains factories in various parts of the United States, but none in New York. There is to be found, however, in the office building at 50 Church street, within the city of New York, a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Tauza v. . Susquehanna Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- International Harvester Co. of America v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Chipman, Ltd. v. Thomas B. Jeffery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Kansas City Structural Steel Co. v. Arkansas Ex Rel. Ashley Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Cochran Box & Manufacturing Co. v. Monroe Binder Board Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Frene v. Louisville Cement Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
- Tignor v. L. G. Balfour & Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1936
- Mas v. Owens-Illinois Glass Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1940
- American Security Credit Co. v. Empire Properties Corp.City of New York Municipal Court · 1935
- Frene v. Louisville Cement Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943