Chipman, Ltd. v. Thomas B. Jeffery Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES - FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT, OF NEW YORK. The case is stated in the opinion. The defendant having filed an express consent that made service upon its designated agent the equivalent of personal service, no . constitutional question is involved. Pennsylvania Fire Ins. Co. v. Gold Issue Mining Co., 243 U. S. 93; Gibbs v. Queen Ins.
Read the full summary
ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES - FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT, OF NEW YORK. The case is stated in the opinion. The defendant having filed an express consent that made service upon its designated agent the equivalent of personal service, no . constitutional question is involved. Pennsylvania Fire Ins. Co. v. Gold Issue Mining Co., 243 U. S. 93; Gibbs v. Queen Ins. Co., 63 N. Y. 114, 128. The offer of. the State and the acceptance thereof by the defendant constituted a contract. The agreement was, among other things, that service could be made upon the statutory agent until his…
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKenna
Plaintiff in error was plaintiff in the courts below; defendant in error was defendant, and we shall refer to them respectively as plaintiff and defendant.
The action was brought in the Supreme Court of the State of New York and removed upon motion of the defendant to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. In the latter court defendant made a motion for an order vacating and setting aside the service of summons, and dismissing the complaint for lack of jurisdiction of the person of the defendant. The motion was granted and the case is here on…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Tauza v. . Susquehanna Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- People's Tobacco Co. v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co. v. McKibbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Simon v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Rosenberg Bros. & Co. v. Curtis Brown Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Davis v. Farmers Co-Operative Equity Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Bomze v. Nardis Sportswear, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
- Shambe v. Delaware Hudson R. R. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Robert Mitchell Furniture Co. v. Selden Breck Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.