Meyers v. Board of Administration for Federated City Employees Retirement Fund
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PREMO, J.
Plaintiff William Meyers was injured on the job while employed by the City of San Jose (the City). He applied to defendant, the Board of Administration for the Federated City Employees Retirement Fund (the Board) for the City of San Jose, for disability retirement benefits as provided for City employees by the San Jose Municipal Code. The Board denied Meyers’s application. Meyers challenged that denial by way of an administrative mandate petition, which the superior court denied. Meyers now appeals from that denial.
We reverse the judgment and direct the trial court to grant…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Howard v. Owens CorningCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Kuhn v. Department of General ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Dickey v. Retirement BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Antelope Valley Press v. PoiznerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Clean Energy Fuels Corp. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Alliance San Diego v. California Taxpayers Action NetworkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025
- Citizens Coal. L. A. v. City of L. A., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Citizens Coalition Los Angeles v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
- Citizens Coalition Los Angeles v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.