Kanters v. Kotick
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Thurston county, Mitchell, J., entered July 2, 1917, upon granting a nonsuit, dismissing an action on contract, tried to the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.
In the spring of 1913, one Williams, one Ray and others were desirous of procuring land *524suitable for a cranberry plantation near Little Rock, Thurston county. Williams was selected to procure such land in his own name, with a view to having it transferred to a corporation when organized. Respondent Kotick gratuitously assisted Williams, who was a stranger at Little Rock, with the enterprise. One Keller was the owner of an eighty-acre tract of land containing some fourteen to twenty acres of marsh land, and held a school land lease from the state of forty acres of marsh land continuing the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Stein v. WaddellWashington Supreme Court · 1905
- Mudgett v. ClayWashington Supreme Court · 1892
- Underwood v. TewWashington Supreme Court · 1893
- Tacoma Water Supply Co. v. DumermuthWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Pacific Bridge Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1903
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- J. D. O'Malley & Co. v. LewisWashington Supreme Court · 1934
- Jacobson v. McMillanIdaho Supreme Court · 1943
- State v. OakleyWashington Supreme Court · 1924
- Spokane State Bank v. TiltonWashington Supreme Court · 1925
- Central Savings Bank v. CoulterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.