Legal Opinion

Kanters v. Kotick

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1918No. 14796PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Thurston county, Mitchell, J., entered July 2, 1917, upon granting a nonsuit, dismissing an action on contract, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

In the spring of 1913, one Williams, one Ray and others were desirous of procuring land *524suitable for a cranberry plantation near Little Rock, Thurston county. Williams was selected to procure such land in his own name, with a view to having it transferred to a corporation when organized. Respondent Kotick gratuitously assisted Williams, who was a stranger at Little Rock, with the enterprise. One Keller was the owner of an eighty-acre tract of land containing some fourteen to twenty acres of marsh land, and held a school land lease from the state of forty acres of marsh land continuing the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stein v. WaddellWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Mudgett v. ClayWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Underwood v. TewWashington Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Tacoma Water Supply Co. v. DumermuthWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Pacific Bridge Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. J. D. O'Malley & Co. v. LewisWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Jacobson v. McMillanIdaho Supreme Court · 1943
  3. State v. OakleyWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Spokane State Bank v. TiltonWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Central Savings Bank v. CoulterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API