Legal Opinion · Dissent

Chas. Kurz Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided July 20, 1966No. C.D. 2733Published

1Dissent

*82DISSENTING OPINION

OliveR, Judge:

I agree that plaintiff’s claim should be denied but I feel that the protests, as originally filed, fail to confer jurisdiction on this court to decide the dutiable status of the centering microscopes described on the entries involved herein. Section 514 of the Tariff Act of 1980 states, inter alia, that the protest be in writing, filed with the collector, “setting forth distinctly and specifically, and in respect to each entry, payment, claim, decision, or refusal, the reasons for the objection thereto.” While this language and that contained in previous acts…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Geo. S. Bush & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1949
  2. Rissman v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  3. American Commerce Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
  4. Kaiser Reismann Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
  5. Shreve v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API