Legal Opinion

City of Birmingham v. Piggly Wiggly

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 14, 1994No. 1920908PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendants, the City of Birmingham and its director of finance, appeal from a $272,738 judgment in favor of the plaintiff, Piggly Wiggly Alabama Distributing Company, Inc., in an action by Piggly Wiggly Distributing to obtain a refund of its alleged overpayment of licensing fees to the City of Birmingham in 1987 and 1988. The issues are: (1) Whether the notice-of-claim and statute of limitations periods of Tit. 62, § 658, Code of Alabama 1940 (Recompiled 1958), and § 3-2-1, the General Code of City of Birmingham, Alabama 1980, are enforceable against Piggly Wiggly Distributing, and (2)…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Kotch v. Board of River Port Pilot Comm'rs for Port of New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Holt Civic Club v. City of TuscaloosaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Peddycoart v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  5. Town Council of Cahaba v. BurnettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1859

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. SunTrust Bank, Nashville v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
  2. Ex Parte MelofSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  3. Ex Parte HealthSouth Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  4. HealthSouth Corp. v. JEFFERSON CTY. TAX ASSESSORCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2006
  5. Town of Pine Bluffs v. EiseleWyoming Supreme Court · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API