City of Birmingham v. Piggly Wiggly
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
The defendants, the City of Birmingham and its director of finance, appeal from a $272,738 judgment in favor of the plaintiff, Piggly Wiggly Alabama Distributing Company, Inc., in an action by Piggly Wiggly Distributing to obtain a refund of its alleged overpayment of licensing fees to the City of Birmingham in 1987 and 1988. The issues are: (1) Whether the notice-of-claim and statute of limitations periods of Tit. 62, § 658, Code of Alabama 1940 (Recompiled 1958), and § 3-2-1, the General Code of City of Birmingham, Alabama 1980, are enforceable against Piggly Wiggly Distributing, and (2)…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Kotch v. Board of River Port Pilot Comm'rs for Port of New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Holt Civic Club v. City of TuscaloosaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Peddycoart v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
- Town Council of Cahaba v. BurnettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1859
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- SunTrust Bank, Nashville v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
- Ex Parte MelofSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
- Ex Parte HealthSouth Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2007
- HealthSouth Corp. v. JEFFERSON CTY. TAX ASSESSORCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2006
- Town of Pine Bluffs v. EiseleWyoming Supreme Court · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.